And Now What?: Coraline
It’s time now for the first ever weekend blog series here. The theme for this bunch of posts will be an exploration of creators struggling to maintain their spark after the onset of success and fame. What do you do when the story you set out to tell is told? Where do you go from there? The title of the series is “And Now What?”
First off, a discussion of a film I watched yesterday, Coraline. Henry Selick, the director of this film, is perhaps the least celebrated director of beloved movies out there. He directed The Nightmare Before Christmas, but the film’s success is attributed to Tim Burton, similarly, Coraline is attributed to Neil Gaiman, whose aesthetic and thematic concerns overwhelm the contributions that Selick brings to the film.
I read Coraline the book a while back, and wasn’t particularly impressed, but seeing the film, particularly after seeing the Gaiman scripted Mirrormask makes it clear that Neil has been on a lengthy cold/lazy streak when it comes to making works that capture the zeitgeist, or at least works that really grab me.
My first time through Sandman, I was absolutely dazzled by what Gaiman was doing. I still think that Sandman is the best comic not written by Morrison or Moore, and is probably more significant to the industry as a whole than any comic that Morrison has written. Sandman was a huge step towards making comics cool in some circles, and of intellectual interest in others. Sandman was the point where the very strong and esoteric work being done within the DCU branched out into the creator owned work that would follow. Vertigo is the HBO of comics, the site of many of the significant works of the past fifteen years, and it exists mostly because of Sandman.
Strangely enough, Neil at this point reminds me a lot of Garth Ennis. Both Ennis and Gaiman wrote a series so perfectly representative of all the themes and character types that engage them that reading anything new they put out feels essentially superfluous. For Ennis, that series was Preacher, for Gaiman, it’s obviously Sandman. Sandman is overflowing with stories, each single issue story brought us into a different world, and built on the overall mythos of the Dreaming. And, the longer stories built nicely on each other, creating a larger meta-narrative out of many little stories.
But, because Sandman is so well done, it can be hard to read anything else Neil has done and find that same fresh innovation. Mirrormask is a riff on the Game of You story from Sandman, and then Coraline is a virtual remake of Mirrormask. That’s not to say it’s a bad movie, it’s just doing the exact same thing I’ve already seen in several other Gaiman stories. Similarly, the god and human interaction in the Eternals or American Gods retread much of the same material covered in Sandman.
I think creators have a right to do the same thing again and again. We’re all drawn to certain types of material, but the trick is making it feel fresh. Wong Kar-Wai’s movies frequently have a similar tone, but by switching from the frenetic visuals of Fallen Angels to the more classical approach of In the Mood for Love, he keeps things fresh. Heat and Public Enemies are extremely similar on a narrative level, but the differences in visual approach and tone make each film feel fresh and unique.
In the case of Gaiman’s work, the central issue is that post Sandman, he’s settled into a really twee tone in virtually all of his work. There’s a lot of dark elements in Coraline, but the overall takeaway is that mix of goth and cutesy that worked fine in the character of Delirium or Death in Sandman, but has gotten a bit old by this point.
To that end, it feels like Gaiman has lost some of the edgier aspects of his work, something that’s a common problem in older creators. Gaiman has carved out an audience who love the stuff he does, they love the subject matter and they love the tone. To go back and do something like the diner short story from the early days of Sandman would be quite jarring. And, without the ongoing format of Sandman to explore, it’s easy to initiate project after project that hits the same emotional beats. Mirrormask is the same story as Coraline in so many ways, and for someone with so many stories, it’s depressing to see that.
That kind of softening is a classic path for older directors and actors. Gaiman has kids, and he probably wants to tell stories they’d like, not things they couldn’t read. But, for the general reader, nothing since Sandman has had the urgency and intensity of Neil at his best.
But, perhaps I’m more a fan of Sandman specifically than Neil’s work in general. Certainly I don’t think any of his prose work comes close to the best of Sandman, or even the early DC works collected in a Gaiman centric trade by DC. Other than Sandman, my favorite Gaiman stuff is his work on Miracleman, which managed to expand on what Alan Moore did without just emulating it. I’ve only read the issues collected in The Golden Age, but they all were drastically different from each other, and different from most other Gaiman works.
So, the possible resumption of that run has me pretty excited. Working in the Miracleman universe will force Gaiman to cut down on some of his easy go to stories, and do something a bit different. That said, it’s going to be interesting to see him pick up a story fifteen years after publication was halted. As we’ve seen with The Godfather Part III or The Phantom Menace, most people usually aren’t satisfied when a beloved series returns after a fifteen year hiatus. However, this might be more analogous to something like Brian Wilson’s Smile album, a modern recreation of what would have been.
But, Coraline to me felt pretty creatively bankrupt. It’s a story I’ve seen before, done better in Mirrormask, and it brought up a lot of my own mixed feelings about Gaiman’s recent output. He’s a great storyteller, but I’d like to see him get out of his comfort zone and do something that isn’t all about that sense of whimsy, and hits a bit harder on an emotional level. Coraline is Gaiman’s equivalent of Ennis writing a comic about an Irish guy who likes to drink and has issues with religion.

7 comments:
Sorry, off topic but have you seen these?
From this year's Lost viral stuff-
first two, with more to follow:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vY37udoLeM
and part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBRr4C1lPuk&annotation_id=annotation_779465&feature=iv
I think it's possible that Gaiman essentially charted out the perimeter of his headspace with the Sandman, and that everything since then has sort of been infill. As creators, we only have certain stories in us. This is pretty obvious with musical acts, which usually seem to fully explore their creative space within about three albums before giving up and just writing the same five songs over and over. This threat of stagnation is why we collaborate, to break out of our ruts and find resonances with the parts of our personalities that are a little more submerged. But Gaiman's schtick has brought him breakthrough mainstream success. It's made him popular and rich as balls, and while we may criticize him for repeating himself, he's got every reason to keep doing what he's doing.
Unusually, I have to disagree with you on a couple aesthetic points. I thought that Mirrormask was a terrible film, a children's adventure utterly ruined by its plodding pace and generic kid-acting-awestruck-on-bluescreen that was already old before Harry Potter started doing it to death in 2001. I also think that although American Gods is largely a Sandman rehash, it has two moments that are utterly captivating in a way totally unlike anything else in Gaiman's ouvre: the extended, largely plotless slice-of-life story in small-town Minnesota, and the totally captivating passage in which Shadow stands vigil for Wednesday. Both of those are just really great pieces of prose that really stick with you.
Yup, I saw both those Lost viral vids, and I loved them. I was really disappointed to hear there's not going to be much Dharma Initiative stuff in season six, so these videos at least give us something. Hopefully they'll track back to reveal some more information about the DeGroots or Hanso and the origins of the Initiative, but if nothing else, they're a fantastic pastiche of that 70/80s TV style, and a great followup to the aesthetic approach of the hatch videos.
I agree with the idea that Gaiman basically did everything he was going to do in future works with Sandman, but you could say the same thing about Morrison and The Invisibles. Everything in Morrison's work either led to, or drew from The Invisibles in some way, but he's managed to keep the same basic ideas fresh in a way that Gaiman has failed to do. All Star Superman draws heavily on Flex Mentallo, but does so in a way that feels personal and relevant for today, as well as infusing the story with the very specific energy of the Superman archetype.
But, Gaiman's problem is that he can churn out the same kind of story and keep getting acclaim for it, so he's got no real reason to push outside the comfort zone. Hopefully Miracleman will re-inspire him to try some new stuff. The Golden Age definitely drew on the structure of Sandman, but felt very different than the world of most Gaiman stories, and the proposed stories of The Silver Age, and the title of The Dark Age sound quite different from the whimsy of most of his current work.
As for American Gods, I did enjoy the book, I think it's the best post Sandman Gaiman. It's merely the fact that I got sort of burned out on his work more recently that made me crack on American Gods in retrospect.
That said, I will defend Mirrormask. I think it could be a great film if it lost 20 minutes of the random CG spectacle you mentioned, but there's enough good moments, and a strong enough emotional core to carry through.
My two cents:
I found Sandman technically proficient, but in the end a rather empty work. By which I mean: Gaiman is a master storyteller, but his ideas (when they are there at all) are unsophisticated and unoriginal. Same goes for American Gods, which I've forgotten entirely.
However, I'm in love with Gaiman's film projects. Strange, huh? The tone of Sandman suggests a work of some majesty and weight, and (Imo) Gaiman's intelligence isn't up to the task. But in his films (which we should remember are for *children*) the cleverness comes as something of a novelty.
I contest the notion that Coraline is just a rerun of Mirrormask. The two use the same set-up, but to very different ends. The former is about maintaining a balance between your conflicting and contradictory nature. The latter is about the dangers of wishing for perfection. Rarely do films for children tread such ground. Also, both are astonishingly beautiful.
Weirdly, I have similar feelings about Garth Ennis's career trajectory. Preacher, the work he will forever be associated with, I found diverting at best. It takes BIG themes -- America, religion -- but says nothing profound about them. For me, Ennis *really* finds his voice doing the grimy, ultra-violent pulp action of Marvel's Punisher. There is an energy in that work completely lacking in Preacher. It's explosive stuff. And his recent excursions into superhero farce (The Boys, The Pro) is like nothing else out there. Wickedly funny. In all, not a writer particularly hung up on 'an Irish guy who likes to drink and has issues with religion'.
The thing about Sandman is that it really affected me on an emotional level at the end, and I think The Kindly Ones story does an expert job of bringing together a whole bunch of disparate threads and making it into a satisfying conclusion. I do like a lot of the earlier stuff, but Kindly Ones is easily my favorite of the run, and I think makes the series as a whole better in retrospect.
But, though Coraline and Mirrormask may have different takeaways in the end, they're the same basic premise, and have a similar tone. Coraline may be a bit lighter, but they're definitely of a piece, a bit too much so I think. Of course, few people saw Mirrormask, so perhaps it was for the best to redo it and get the story out to a wider audience.
Post a Comment